Skip to main content

Lead Quality Metrics

Learn how to measure and interpret lead quality using Catchlight Score, match confidence levels, and quality distribution metrics to prioritize your best opportunities.

Chris Ross avatar
Written by Chris Ross
Updated over 2 weeks ago

Not all leads are created equal. Lead quality metrics help you identify which prospects are most likely to convert, allowing you to focus your time and energy on your best opportunities.

Understanding Lead Quality

Lead quality refers to how well a prospect matches the profile of someone likely to purchase financial advisory services. Catchlight uses AI models and data matching confidence to quantify quality into measurable metrics.

Two Dimensions of Quality

1. Catchlight Score - Likelihood to convert (AI prediction)

2. Match Confidence - Data accuracy and reliability (matching quality)

Both dimensions matter for effective prioritization.

Key Lead Quality Metrics

Average Catchlight Score

What it measures: The mean Catchlight Score across all leads in your selected time period or filter set

Displayed as: Whole number on 0-100 scale (e.g., "76")

Score meaning:

  • 80-100: Excellent - Very high conversion likelihood

  • 70-79: Good - Above-average conversion likelihood

  • 60-69: Fair - Moderate conversion likelihood

  • 50-59: Below Average - Lower conversion likelihood

  • 0-49: Low - Minimal conversion likelihood

Why it matters:

  • Indicates overall database quality

  • Shows if your lead generation is attracting the right prospects

  • Helps benchmark against industry standards

Good average: 70 or higher

Concerning average: Below 60

How to improve:

  • Refine lead generation targeting

  • Focus on higher-quality sources

  • Remove or deprioritize low-scoring leads

  • Adjust ideal customer profile criteria


High-Scoring Lead Count

What it measures: Number of leads with Catchlight Score above a specific threshold (typically 70+, 80+, or 90+)

Displayed as: Whole number (e.g., "342 leads with score 70+")

Common thresholds:

  • 70+: Good quality, worth pursuing

  • 80+: High quality, priority leads

  • 90+: Exceptional quality, top priority

Why it matters:

  • Shows the absolute number of quality opportunities

  • Helps size your high-priority pipeline

  • Indicates whether quality is growing or shrinking

What to do:

  • Focus outreach on 80+ scored leads first

  • Create separate campaigns for 90+ scored leads

  • Monitor growth in high-scoring segments


Lead Score Distribution

What it measures: How your leads break down across different score ranges

Displayed as: Chart or percentage breakdown

Example distribution:

  • 90-100: 5% (50 leads)

  • 80-89: 15% (150 leads)

  • 70-79: 30% (300 leads)

  • 60-69: 25% (250 leads)

  • 50-59: 15% (150 leads)

  • 0-49: 10% (100 leads)

Ideal distribution:

  • Top-heavy: More leads in higher score ranges

  • Few leads below 50

Concerning distribution:

  • Bottom-heavy: Most leads in lower score ranges

  • Few leads above 70


Match Confidence Distribution

What it measures: How your enriched leads break down by match confidence level

Displayed as: Chart or percentage breakdown

Confidence levels:

  • Excellent (90-100%): Best quality matches

  • Good (70-89%): High confidence matches

  • Fair (50-69%): Moderate confidence, verify details

  • Low (<50%): Questionable matches, needs verification

Ideal distribution:

  • 70%+ of leads with "Excellent" or "Good" confidence

  • Less than 10% with "Low" confidence

Concerning distribution:

  • Most leads in "Fair" or "Low" categories

  • Less than 50% with "Good" or better

Why it matters:

  • Affects how much you can trust the enrichment data

  • Determines which leads need manual verification

  • Indicates quality of input data


Low Confidence Lead Count

What it measures: Number of leads with match confidence below acceptable thresholds

Displayed as: Whole number (e.g., "23 low confidence matches")

Why it matters:

  • These leads need extra verification

  • Data may be inaccurate

  • Risk of damaging credibility if used incorrectly

What to do:

  • Review manually before outreach

  • Cross-reference with LinkedIn

  • Verify critical details directly

  • Consider re-submitting with better data


Quality Score Trend

What it measures: How average Catchlight Score changes over time

Displayed as: Line chart or trend indicator with baseline comparison

Positive trend (score increasing):

  • Lead generation improving

  • Better targeting working

  • Quality sources performing well

Negative trend (score declining):

  • Lead quality degrading

  • Poor sources being added

  • Need to adjust targeting

What to monitor:

  • Week-over-week changes

  • Month-over-month trends

  • Impact of new lead sources

How Catchlight Score Works


The Science Behind the Score

Catchlight Score uses AI models to predict conversion likelihood based on:

Demographic signals:

  • Age and life stage

  • Education level

  • Career progression

Financial indicators:

  • Income estimates

  • Investable assets

  • Home value

  • Wealth segment

Behavioral patterns:

  • Professional network size

  • Recent life events

  • Job changes and progression

Similarity to converted clients:

  • How closely the lead matches profiles of people who previously became clients

Score range: 0-100 (higher = more likely to convert)

What Catchlight Score Predicts

High scores (80-100) indicate:

  • Strong demographic fit

  • Significant financial capacity

  • Life stage appropriate for financial planning

  • Similar to previously converted clients

  • Multiple positive indicators

Low scores (0-49) indicate:

  • Weak demographic fit

  • Limited financial capacity signals

  • Less similarity to converted client profiles

  • Fewer positive indicators

Important Limitations

Catchlight Score is directional:

  • It's a probability, not a guarantee

  • One data point among many to consider

  • Should inform, not dictate, your strategy

Context matters:

  • A score of 65 may be great for certain niches

  • Personal relationships can overcome low scores

  • Warm referrals may convert despite lower scores

Use it as a tiebreaker:

  • When prioritizing between similar leads

  • When limited time requires focus

  • For campaign segmentation

Using Lead Quality Metrics Strategically

Strategy 1: Priority Tiering

Tier 1 (Immediate Focus):

  • Catchlight Score: 80+

  • Match Confidence: Excellent or Good

  • Action: Personal outreach, phone calls, custom messaging

Tier 2 (Active Pursuit):

  • Catchlight Score: 70-79

  • Match Confidence: Good or Fair

  • Action: Email campaigns, event invitations, educational content

Tier 3 (Nurture):

  • Catchlight Score: 60-69

  • Match Confidence: Fair or Good

  • Action: Automated drip campaigns, periodic check-ins

Tier 4 (Long-term/Low Priority):

  • Catchlight Score: Below 60

  • Action: Minimal effort, automated touches only


Strategy 2: Quality-Based Campaign Segmentation

VIP Campaign (Score 90+):

  • Personalized video messages

  • Direct mail with premium materials

  • One-on-one consultation offers

  • Concierge service

High-Value Campaign (Score 80-89):

  • Personal emails from advisor

  • Exclusive webinar invitations

  • High-touch content

  • Priority response

Standard Campaign (Score 70-79):

  • Targeted email series

  • Group webinars

  • Educational resources

  • Standard response time

Nurture Campaign (Score 60-69):

  • Automated email sequences

  • General educational content

  • Quarterly check-ins


Strategy 3: Source Quality Optimization

Track quality by lead source:

Source

Avg Score

% Above 70

Action

Referrals

85

80%

Expand referral program

LinkedIn

72

65%

Maintain current effort

Purchased Lists

45

15%

Discontinue or reduce

Webinars

78

70%

Invest more in webinars

Optimize budget and effort:

  • Increase investment in high-quality sources

  • Reduce or eliminate low-quality sources

  • Test and measure new sources

Combining Quality Metrics with Other Filters

Example 1: High-Quality Pre-Retirees

Filters:

  • Catchlight Score: 80+

  • Event Topic: 1-2 Years from Retirement

  • Match Confidence: Good or better

Result: Your absolute best retirement planning prospects

Action: VIP outreach campaign


Example 2: Quality Trends by Time Period

Analysis:

  • Date Range: Last 90 Days

  • Baseline: Previous 90 Days

  • Metric: Average Catchlight Score

Question: Is lead quality improving or declining?

Decision: Adjust lead generation based on trend


Example 3: Wealth + Quality Intersection

Filters:

  • Wealth Segment: High Net Worth

  • Catchlight Score: 70+

Result: High-value prospects with good conversion likelihood

Action: Top priority for advisor time

Quality Benchmarks and Goals

Excellent Performance

  • Average Catchlight Score: 75+

  • Leads scoring 70+: 60% or more

  • Leads scoring 80+: 30% or more

  • Match confidence "Good" or better: 80%+

Good Performance

  • Average Catchlight Score: 70-74

  • Leads scoring 70+: 50-59%

  • Leads scoring 80+: 20-29%

  • Match confidence "Good" or better: 70-79%

Needs Improvement

  • Average Catchlight Score: Below 70

  • Leads scoring 70+: Below 50%

  • Leads scoring 80+: Below 20%

  • Match confidence "Good" or better: Below 70%

Improving Lead Quality Metrics

Tactic 1: Refine Your ICP (Ideal Customer Profile)

Analyze high-scoring leads:

  • What characteristics do they share?

  • Which demographics appear frequently?

  • What life events are common?

Adjust targeting:

  • Focus marketing on similar profiles

  • Refine your messaging to attract these prospects

  • Choose channels where these prospects congregate


Tactic 2: Quality Over Quantity

Shift mindset:

  • 100 high-quality leads > 1,000 low-quality leads

  • Better conversion rates from focused effort

  • Higher lifetime value from quality clients

Actions:

  • Set minimum score thresholds for campaigns

  • Decline or deprioritize sub-60 scored leads

  • Train team on quality indicators


Tactic 3: Improve Data Inputs for Better Matching

Better inputs = better confidence = more reliable scores:

  • Collect complete contact information

  • Verify email addresses and phone numbers

  • Include LinkedIn profiles when possible

  • Ensure accurate spelling of names


Tactic 4: Regular Quality Audits

Monthly review:

  • Export low-scoring leads (below 60)

  • Analyze common characteristics

  • Identify problematic sources

  • Remove or fix data issues


Tactic 5: Test and Optimize Lead Sources

Experiment:

  • Try new channels (LinkedIn, webinars, partnerships)

  • Measure average score by source

  • Double down on high-quality sources

  • Eliminate low-quality sources

Quality Metrics Red Flags

Watch for these warning signs:

🚩 Average score declining month-over-month

  • Lead quality degrading

  • Review recent lead sources

🚩 High volume, low quality (many leads, low scores)

  • Quantity-focused strategy backfiring

  • Shift to quality focus

🚩 Increasing low-confidence matches

  • Input data quality declining

  • Review data collection processes

🚩 Very few leads above 70

  • Targeting misalignment

  • May be reaching wrong audience

🚩 Quality varies wildly by source

  • Inconsistent lead generation

  • Need source quality standards

Next Steps

Explore related topics:

  • Catchlight Score Explained - Deep dive into scoring methodology

  • Match Confidence - Understanding data reliability

  • Prioritizing Leads - Using quality metrics for outreach decisions

  • Revenue Potential Metrics - Combining quality with financial opportunity


Golden Rule: Score 70+ is your "quality threshold." Focus 80% of your outreach effort on leads above this line, and you'll see significantly better results.

Did this answer your question?