Skip to main content

Catchlight Score Explained

The Catchlight Score is a proprietary 0-100 predictive score that estimates how likely a prospect or client is to engage with you, based on their digital presence, professional activity, responsiveness patterns, and demographic factors.

Chris Ross avatar
Written by Chris Ross
Updated over 2 weeks ago

What is the Catchlight Score?

The Catchlight Score is a predictive engagement score ranging from 0 to 100 that helps you prioritize outreach efforts by identifying which prospects and clients are most likely to respond positively to your contact.

Think of it as: A "lead temperature" indicator that helps you focus time on the warmest opportunities.

Not a measure of:

  • Client value or worth

  • Investment sophistication

  • Wealth level (that's captured in other fields)

  • Relationship quality for existing clients

Is a measure of:

  • Likelihood to engage and respond

  • Digital and professional activity levels

  • Accessibility and reachability

  • Openness to professional connections

How the Catchlight Score is Calculated

The score uses a proprietary algorithm that considers multiple factors:

Digital Presence and Activity (30-40%)

  • Social media presence: Active LinkedIn, Facebook profiles

  • Profile completeness: Detailed vs. minimal information

  • Update frequency: Recently updated vs. stale profiles

  • Professional networking: LinkedIn connections, activity, engagement

  • Online footprint: Discoverable information, public engagement

Higher scores: Active LinkedIn users with complete profiles, regular updates Lower scores: Minimal social media presence, sparse profiles

Professional Factors (25-35%)

  • Job level: Executives and senior professionals typically score higher

  • Company size: Employees at larger, established companies

  • Industry: Certain industries (tech, finance, professional services) score higher

  • Career trajectory: Recent job changes, promotions indicate activity

  • Professional visibility: Published articles, speaking engagements, awards

Higher scores: Senior professionals at established companies with visible careers Lower scores: Entry-level, undefined employment, minimal professional visibility

Demographic Indicators (20-30%)

  • Age: Mid-career (35-55) typically scores higher than very young or very old

  • Education: Advanced degrees correlate with higher scores

  • Geographic location: Urban and suburban higher than rural

  • Homeownership: Homeowners score slightly higher

  • Household stability: Established households vs. transient

Higher scores: Mid-career, educated, suburban homeowners Lower scores: Early career, transient, minimal established roots

Responsiveness Signals (10-20%)

  • Email validity: Verified, current email address

  • Contact accuracy: Up-to-date phone, address information

  • Recent changes: Activity suggesting engagement (job change, home purchase)

  • Public engagement: Participation in professional or community activities

Higher scores: Current, verified contact info, recent life activity Lower scores: Outdated contacts, no recent detectable activity

Interpreting Score Ranges

80-100: Highly Engaged (Hot Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Active professional and social media presence

  • Current, complete contact information

  • Senior professional or business owner

  • Recent career or life activity

  • Strong digital footprint

Recommended approach:

  • Priority outreach: Top of your contact list

  • Personalized communication: Research their background, reference specific details

  • Multi-channel: LinkedIn + email + phone

  • Timely follow-up: Respond quickly, strike while iron is hot

  • Premium service: Worth dedicating senior advisor time

Expected engagement rate: 30-50% response to cold outreach, 60-80% to warm introductions

Example: 52-year-old CFO at Fortune 500 company, active on LinkedIn, recently promoted, complete profile with professional headshot, verified email and phone.


60-79: Moderately Engaged (Warm Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Some social media presence, may not be highly active

  • Professional information available

  • Established career, stable situation

  • Generally reachable

  • Standard digital activity

Recommended approach:

  • Consistent outreach: Regular nurture campaigns

  • Value-first content: Educational resources, invitations to events

  • Patience: May take 3-5 touches to engage

  • Segmented campaigns: Group messaging with personalization

  • Team advisor: Can be assigned to associate or junior advisors

Expected engagement rate: 15-25% response to outreach

Example: 45-year-old manager at medium-sized company, basic LinkedIn profile, verified contact info, homeowner, no recent major activity.


40-59: Lower Engagement (Cool Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Minimal social media presence

  • Limited professional information

  • May have outdated contact information

  • Less active digitally

  • Harder to reach

Recommended approach:

  • Automated nurture: Email drip campaigns, digital marketing

  • Lower-touch: Don't invest heavy personal time upfront

  • Long-term cultivation: Multi-month or multi-year nurture

  • Group events: Invitations to seminars, webinars (low cost per contact)

  • Digital-first service: Robo or hybrid service model if they do engage

Expected engagement rate: 5-10% response to outreach

Example: 38-year-old with minimal online presence, unclear current employment, limited contact information, no recent activity detected.


0-39: Unlikely to Engage (Cold Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Little to no digital presence

  • Sparse or outdated information

  • Contact information may be invalid

  • Very private or digitally disconnected

  • Difficult to reach through standard channels

Recommended approach:

  • Low-priority outreach: Bottom of priority list

  • Bulk campaigns only: Only contact via automated, low-cost channels

  • Referral or personal introduction: If you really want to reach them, find a warm introduction

  • Re-evaluate periodically: Scores can improve as information updates

  • Consider skipping: May not be worth the effort

Expected engagement rate: 0-5% response to outreach

Example: 65-year-old retiree with no social media, minimal public information, potentially outdated contact data.


How to Use the Catchlight Score

Prioritization and Time Management

Focus Your Personal Time:

  • High scores (80-100): Personal research, customized outreach, direct calls

  • Medium scores (60-79): Personalized email campaigns, event invitations

  • Low scores (40-59): Automated campaigns, generic content

  • Very low scores (0-39): Minimal effort or skip unless other factors warrant

ROI Optimization: Your time is limited. Spending 30 minutes on a score-90 prospect yields much better results than the same time on a score-30 prospect.

Combining with Other Filters

The Catchlight Score is most powerful when combined with other data:

High-Value + High-Score:

  • Filter: Catchlight Score 80+ AND Projected Revenue $15K+ AND Life Event present

  • Result: Your absolute highest-priority opportunities

  • Action: Immediate, personalized, senior advisor outreach

High-Score + Growing Wealth:

  • Filter: Catchlight Score 70+ AND Age 35-50 AND Income $150K+

  • Result: Engaged prospects with growth potential

  • Action: Long-term relationship building

High-Score + Specific Niche:

  • Filter: Catchlight Score 75+ AND Current Employer = [Target Company]

  • Result: Engaged employees at target organization

  • Action: Company-specific outreach campaign

Campaign Design

Tiered Campaigns: Design different campaign levels based on score:

Tier 1 (Score 80+):

  • Personal phone call + LinkedIn connection + personalized email

  • Senior advisor assigned

  • Offer of complimentary planning session

  • Quick follow-up cadence (3-5 days)

Tier 2 (Score 60-79):

  • Personalized email campaign (3-touch series)

  • Invitation to relevant event

  • Associate advisor assigned

  • Follow-up cadence (7-10 days)

Tier 3 (Score 40-59):

  • Automated email nurture (monthly)

  • Digital content offers (webinars, guides)

  • Team or robo-advisor service

  • Quarterly touchpoints

Tier 4 (Score 0-39):

  • Bulk email only (if at all)

  • Re-evaluate quarterly for score changes

  • Referral-only approach

A/B Testing and Optimization

Use score segments to test messaging:

  • Test different subject lines on score 70-79 group

  • Measure response rates by score bracket

  • Optimize future campaigns based on what works for each tier

Score Updates and Changes

Update Frequency: Monthly

What Causes Score Increases:

  • LinkedIn profile updates or increased activity

  • Job change or promotion

  • New contact information added

  • Recent home purchase or life event

  • Increased online presence

What Causes Score Decreases:

  • Contact information becomes outdated (bounced emails)

  • No detectable activity for extended period

  • Social media profiles become inactive

  • Job becomes undefined or unemployment

Monitoring Changes:

  • Set alerts for significant score increases (20+ points)

  • Review clients whose scores drop significantly (may indicate disengagement)

  • Track score trends over time (improving vs. declining engagement likelihood)

Limitations and Considerations

What the Score Doesn't Tell You

Not a Relationship Quality Measure: A long-time client with low score isn't a bad client—they're just less digitally active. Don't neglect them based on score.

Not a Value Indicator: Low-score clients can be very wealthy. Private, wealthy individuals often have minimal digital presence intentionally.

Not a Prediction of Service Needs: High score doesn't mean high financial planning needs. Low score doesn't mean low needs.

Not a Substitute for Human Judgment: Someone with a low score but a warm referral from your best client is absolutely worth prioritizing over a high-score cold lead.

When to Ignore the Score

Existing Clients: Use score primarily for prospects and leads. For current clients, prioritize based on relationship, revenue, planning needs, and engagement history—not Catchlight Score.

Warm Referrals: A personal introduction from a trusted source trumps any score. A referred score-40 prospect is better than an unreferred score-90.

Strategic Relationships: Centers of influence, referral partners, niche targets, or strategic hires at target companies may warrant outreach regardless of score.

Unique Circumstances: Recent inheritance, business sale, or specific life event creates opportunity regardless of engagement score.

Privacy and Ethical Use

Transparency: If asked, you can explain that you use data analytics to identify who might benefit most from financial planning, but you don't need to mention a specific "score."

Non-Discrimination: Don't use score to deny service. Use it to prioritize proactive outreach, not to reject incoming inquiries.

Respect Low Scores: Some people intentionally maintain low digital profiles for privacy. Respect that choice.

Practical Examples

Example 1: New Prospect List You upload 500 prospects from a networking event.

  • Sort by Catchlight Score descending

  • Filter for scores 70+: 87 prospects

  • Add filter for Projected Revenue $10K+: 34 prospects

  • Start outreach with these 34 highest-priority contacts

Example 2: Re-engagement Campaign You have 200 cold leads from 2 years ago.

  • Filter for Catchlight Score 60+ (scores may have improved): 52 contacts

  • Add filter for Recent Life Event: 15 contacts

  • Launch re-engagement campaign to these 15 with event-specific messaging

Example 3: Resource Allocation You're assigning leads to your team:

  • Score 80+: Senior advisor (you)

  • Score 60-79: Mid-level associate

  • Score 40-59: Junior associate

  • Score 0-39: Automated digital nurture only

Related Articles

  • 6.1: Prioritizing Leads

  • 5.9: Social Capital Score

  • 3.3: Using Filters to Refine Your View

  • 6.2: Personalizing Outreach

  • 7.1: Data Accuracy and Limitations

Did this answer your question?