Skip to main content

Catchlight Score Explained

The Catchlight Score is a proprietary 0-100 predictive score that estimates how likely a prospect or client is to engage with you, based on their digital presence, professional activity, responsiveness patterns, and demographic factors.

Written by Chris Ross

What is the Catchlight Score?

The Catchlight Score is a predictive engagement score ranging from 0 to 100 that helps you prioritize outreach efforts by identifying which prospects and clients are most likely to respond positively to your contact.

Think of it as: A "lead temperature" indicator that helps you focus time on the warmest opportunities.

Not a measure of:

  • Client value or worth

  • Investment sophistication

  • Wealth level (that's captured in other fields)

  • Relationship quality for existing clients

Is a measure of:

  • Likelihood to engage and respond

  • Digital and professional activity levels

  • Accessibility and reachability

  • Openness to professional connections

How the Catchlight Score is Calculated

The score uses a proprietary algorithm that considers multiple factors:

Digital Presence and Activity (30-40%)

  • Social media presence: Active LinkedIn, Facebook profiles

  • Profile completeness: Detailed vs. minimal information

  • Update frequency: Recently updated vs. stale profiles

  • Professional networking: LinkedIn connections, activity, engagement

  • Online footprint: Discoverable information, public engagement

Higher scores: Active LinkedIn users with complete profiles, regular updates Lower scores: Minimal social media presence, sparse profiles

Professional Factors (25-35%)

  • Job level: Executives and senior professionals typically score higher

  • Company size: Employees at larger, established companies

  • Industry: Certain industries (tech, finance, professional services) score higher

  • Career trajectory: Recent job changes, promotions indicate activity

  • Professional visibility: Published articles, speaking engagements, awards

Higher scores: Senior professionals at established companies with visible careers Lower scores: Entry-level, undefined employment, minimal professional visibility

Demographic Indicators (20-30%)

  • Age: Mid-career (35-55) typically scores higher than very young or very old

  • Education: Advanced degrees correlate with higher scores

  • Geographic location: Urban and suburban higher than rural

  • Homeownership: Homeowners score slightly higher

  • Household stability: Established households vs. transient

Higher scores: Mid-career, educated, suburban homeowners Lower scores: Early career, transient, minimal established roots

Responsiveness Signals (10-20%)

  • Email validity: Verified, current email address

  • Contact accuracy: Up-to-date phone, address information

  • Recent changes: Activity suggesting engagement (job change, home purchase)

  • Public engagement: Participation in professional or community activities

Higher scores: Current, verified contact info, recent life activity Lower scores: Outdated contacts, no recent detectable activity

Interpreting Score Ranges

80-100: Highly Engaged (Hot Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Active professional and social media presence

  • Current, complete contact information

  • Senior professional or business owner

  • Recent career or life activity

  • Strong digital footprint

Recommended approach:

  • Priority outreach: Top of your contact list

  • Personalized communication: Research their background, reference specific details

  • Multi-channel: LinkedIn + email + phone

  • Timely follow-up: Respond quickly, strike while iron is hot

  • Premium service: Worth dedicating senior advisor time

Expected engagement rate: 30-50% response to cold outreach, 60-80% to warm introductions

Example: 52-year-old CFO at Fortune 500 company, active on LinkedIn, recently promoted, complete profile with professional headshot, verified email and phone.


60-79: Moderately Engaged (Warm Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Some social media presence, may not be highly active

  • Professional information available

  • Established career, stable situation

  • Generally reachable

  • Standard digital activity

Recommended approach:

  • Consistent outreach: Regular nurture campaigns

  • Value-first content: Educational resources, invitations to events

  • Patience: May take 3-5 touches to engage

  • Segmented campaigns: Group messaging with personalization

  • Team advisor: Can be assigned to associate or junior advisors

Expected engagement rate: 15-25% response to outreach

Example: 45-year-old manager at medium-sized company, basic LinkedIn profile, verified contact info, homeowner, no recent major activity.


40-59: Lower Engagement (Cool Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Minimal social media presence

  • Limited professional information

  • May have outdated contact information

  • Less active digitally

  • Harder to reach

Recommended approach:

  • Automated nurture: Email drip campaigns, digital marketing

  • Lower-touch: Don't invest heavy personal time upfront

  • Long-term cultivation: Multi-month or multi-year nurture

  • Group events: Invitations to seminars, webinars (low cost per contact)

  • Digital-first service: Robo or hybrid service model if they do engage

Expected engagement rate: 5-10% response to outreach

Example: 38-year-old with minimal online presence, unclear current employment, limited contact information, no recent activity detected.


0-39: Unlikely to Engage (Cold Leads)

Characteristics:

  • Little to no digital presence

  • Sparse or outdated information

  • Contact information may be invalid

  • Very private or digitally disconnected

  • Difficult to reach through standard channels

Recommended approach:

  • Low-priority outreach: Bottom of priority list

  • Bulk campaigns only: Only contact via automated, low-cost channels

  • Referral or personal introduction: If you really want to reach them, find a warm introduction

  • Re-evaluate periodically: Scores can improve as information updates

  • Consider skipping: May not be worth the effort

Expected engagement rate: 0-5% response to outreach

Example: 65-year-old retiree with no social media, minimal public information, potentially outdated contact data.


How to Use the Catchlight Score

Prioritization and Time Management

Focus Your Personal Time:

  • High scores (80-100): Personal research, customized outreach, direct calls

  • Medium scores (60-79): Personalized email campaigns, event invitations

  • Low scores (40-59): Automated campaigns, generic content

  • Very low scores (0-39): Minimal effort or skip unless other factors warrant

ROI Optimization: Your time is limited. Spending 30 minutes on a score-90 prospect yields much better results than the same time on a score-30 prospect.

Combining with Other Filters

The Catchlight Score is most powerful when combined with other data:

High-Value + High-Score:

  • Filter: Catchlight Score 80+ AND Projected Revenue $15K+ AND Life Event present

  • Result: Your absolute highest-priority opportunities

  • Action: Immediate, personalized, senior advisor outreach

High-Score + Growing Wealth:

  • Filter: Catchlight Score 70+ AND Age 35-50 AND Income $150K+

  • Result: Engaged prospects with growth potential

  • Action: Long-term relationship building

High-Score + Specific Niche:

  • Filter: Catchlight Score 75+ AND Current Employer = [Target Company]

  • Result: Engaged employees at target organization

  • Action: Company-specific outreach campaign

Campaign Design

Tiered Campaigns: Design different campaign levels based on score:

Tier 1 (Score 80+):

  • Personal phone call + LinkedIn connection + personalized email

  • Senior advisor assigned

  • Offer of complimentary planning session

  • Quick follow-up cadence (3-5 days)

Tier 2 (Score 60-79):

  • Personalized email campaign (3-touch series)

  • Invitation to relevant event

  • Associate advisor assigned

  • Follow-up cadence (7-10 days)

Tier 3 (Score 40-59):

  • Automated email nurture (monthly)

  • Digital content offers (webinars, guides)

  • Team or robo-advisor service

  • Quarterly touchpoints

Tier 4 (Score 0-39):

  • Bulk email only (if at all)

  • Re-evaluate quarterly for score changes

  • Referral-only approach

A/B Testing and Optimization

Use score segments to test messaging:

  • Test different subject lines on score 70-79 group

  • Measure response rates by score bracket

  • Optimize future campaigns based on what works for each tier

Score Updates and Changes

Update Frequency: Monthly

What Causes Score Increases:

  • LinkedIn profile updates or increased activity

  • Job change or promotion

  • New contact information added

  • Recent home purchase or life event

  • Increased online presence

What Causes Score Decreases:

  • Contact information becomes outdated (bounced emails)

  • No detectable activity for extended period

  • Social media profiles become inactive

  • Job becomes undefined or unemployment

Monitoring Changes:

  • Set alerts for significant score increases (20+ points)

  • Review clients whose scores drop significantly (may indicate disengagement)

  • Track score trends over time (improving vs. declining engagement likelihood)

Limitations and Considerations

What the Score Doesn't Tell You

Not a Relationship Quality Measure: A long-time client with low score isn't a bad client—they're just less digitally active. Don't neglect them based on score.

Not a Value Indicator: Low-score clients can be very wealthy. Private, wealthy individuals often have minimal digital presence intentionally.

Not a Prediction of Service Needs: High score doesn't mean high financial planning needs. Low score doesn't mean low needs.

Not a Substitute for Human Judgment: Someone with a low score but a warm referral from your best client is absolutely worth prioritizing over a high-score cold lead.

When to Ignore the Score

Existing Clients: Use score primarily for prospects and leads. For current clients, prioritize based on relationship, revenue, planning needs, and engagement history—not Catchlight Score.

Warm Referrals: A personal introduction from a trusted source trumps any score. A referred score-40 prospect is better than an unreferred score-90.

Strategic Relationships: Centers of influence, referral partners, niche targets, or strategic hires at target companies may warrant outreach regardless of score.

Unique Circumstances: Recent inheritance, business sale, or specific life event creates opportunity regardless of engagement score.

Privacy and Ethical Use

Transparency: If asked, you can explain that you use data analytics to identify who might benefit most from financial planning, but you don't need to mention a specific "score."

Non-Discrimination: Don't use score to deny service. Use it to prioritize proactive outreach, not to reject incoming inquiries.

Respect Low Scores: Some people intentionally maintain low digital profiles for privacy. Respect that choice.

Practical Examples

Example 1: New Prospect List You upload 500 prospects from a networking event.

  • Sort by Catchlight Score descending

  • Filter for scores 70+: 87 prospects

  • Add filter for Projected Revenue $10K+: 34 prospects

  • Start outreach with these 34 highest-priority contacts

Example 2: Re-engagement Campaign You have 200 cold leads from 2 years ago.

  • Filter for Catchlight Score 60+ (scores may have improved): 52 contacts

  • Add filter for Recent Life Event: 15 contacts

  • Launch re-engagement campaign to these 15 with event-specific messaging

Example 3: Resource Allocation You're assigning leads to your team:

  • Score 80+: Senior advisor (you)

  • Score 60-79: Mid-level associate

  • Score 40-59: Junior associate

  • Score 0-39: Automated digital nurture only

Related Articles

  • 6.1: Prioritizing Leads

  • 5.9: Social Capital Score

  • 3.3: Using Filters to Refine Your View

  • 6.2: Personalizing Outreach

  • 7.1: Data Accuracy and Limitations

Did this answer your question?